Open sourcing this data set would then allow third parties to develop their own goods and services (in exactly the way that open source data published by Transport for London, OpenStreetMaps and others has allowed the creation of common apps such as Citymapper, Bus Checker and Waze).
There are also things happening purely from a compliance perspective, such as aluminum cladding replacement programs.These are government pieces of work, specifically looking for innovative techniques.
Ultimately, there are similar standards to 19650 coming into play.Level 2 is coming in with the language.There’s also a relationship in terms of how smart contracts are being tied into those sorts of outcomes.
However, much of this evolution is happening in a piecemeal way.. asBuilt believe the situation is too big for the government to bring entirely under control, and say there are cost overruns for the benefits they’re realizing, which pertain to the inputs.Lamont calls it a case of swings and roundabouts, noting that without action you get nothing, yet once something is prescribed it seems to be too much.
There’s a balancing act required.
However, he says that people are genuinely looking for ways to de-risk programs of work and make additional profit.He says both prescription and innovation have a role to play.
With respect to 19650 and UK standards, he says there’s a recognition in Australia that some kind of standard is needed to meet the requirement, but currently people are doing a little bit of their own thing.This is creating confusion surrounding outputs in terms of what people are receiving and why.
Currently, after designers create the concept design (including testing related to the engineering), things get handed over to the contractors to de-risk the program, make changes, and make the design work for them.They then deliver what’s left back to the client.